Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Delta v. Lockfehn
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Delta v. Lockfehn
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Akko v. Loher Schwarten and Dam Amsel v. Hahnentange
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 6.250%    low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)75
    Ancestor Loss-13
    Ancestor Loss in %120.97 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Amsel v. Hahnentange50.00011
    Akko v. Loher Schwarten50.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck28.120211
    Henry v. Forstgarten25.00011
    Orka v. Linduri25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Izzy v. Buchheim25.00011
    Lona v. Linduri25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri18.750211
    Greif v. Reitbach18.750211
    Amsel v. Silbergrund15.620211
    Bautz v. d. Leda15.620211
    Aischa v. Heek12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg12.50011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel9.370211
    Rika v. Linduri9.370211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Ossy De Wynen6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.24022
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.24022
    Anton v. Hasselrath3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Alf v. Geierling3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lady v. Hülsebusch3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Rig Chamavia3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s