Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Birke v. d. Röttenkath
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Birke v. d. Röttenkath
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Karlo v. d. Jade and Dam Kaja v. Heesenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kaja v. Heesenhof50.00011
    Karlo v. d. Jade50.00011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein25.00011
    Gero v. Reitbach25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Antje v. Horum25.00011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Rena v. Elbufer12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Cody v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Bea v. Calveslage12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri9.370211
    Cora v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Amor v. Butendieks3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Ambra v. Struthof3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s