Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Charly v. Kärntner Gspann
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Charly v. Kärntner Gspann
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hunter v. Veybach and Dam Zora v. Minatal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Zora v. Minatal50.00011
    Hunter v. Veybach50.00011
    Ivo v. Buchheim25.00011
    Karlotta-Isa v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Nestor v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Yra v. Minatal25.00011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Auguste v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50022
    Hanko v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Tina v. Minatal12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.24022
    Jerome De Wynen6.24022
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s