Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Schoko v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Schoko v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Egon v. Buchheim and Dam Leonie v. Alten Hafen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen50.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim50.00011
    Anja v. Veybach25.00011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Basko v. Tannengarten25.00011
    Lilli v. Buchheim12.50011
    Milla v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Jule v. Linduri12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.490312
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s