Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Rudi v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Rudi v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Schorsch v. d. Schmiede and Dam Jazz v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Jazz v. Buchheim50.00011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Boss v. Mellin25.00011
    Etzel v. Buchheim25.00011
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Anja v. Veybach12.50011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Katteneck's Daisy12.50011
    Ondra v. Stockey12.50011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Aenne v. Stockey6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Milla v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Brack v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Gusti v. Stockey6.25011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.24022
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Bonny v. Brückhof3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Clitt v. Westermoor DK3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Mira v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Laika v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Orpheus v. Innviertel DK3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s