Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Charly v. Kraxberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Charly v. Kraxberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dolf v. Hühnerberg and Dam Hella v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.660%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hella v. Linduri50.00011
    Dolf v. Hühnerberg50.00011
    Lara de Wynen25.00011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Birko v. Lossetal25.00011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Britta v. Hasselbach12.50011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke12.50011
    Hazel De Wynen12.50011
    Xaver v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen12.50011
    Astor v. d. Weide12.50011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand9.370211
    Natter v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Afra v. Seggehorn6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Mary v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.25011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde6.25011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp6.25011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Fanny De Wynen6.25011
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode6.25011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn6.25011
    Elko v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Lady De Wynen3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Basko v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Alf v. d. Strohee3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel3.12011
    Beste v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller3.12011
    Cilla v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eske v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Assi v. Grabengrund3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Anka v. d. Flachsbäke3.12011
    Bob v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Lissi v.d Böckelsburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s