Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Asta v. Kumpfmühl
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Asta v. Kumpfmühl
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Merlin v. d. Haagerleiten and Dam Agi v. Minatal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Merlin v. d. Haagerleiten50.00011
    Agi v. Minatal50.00011
    Yra v. Minatal25.00011
    Karlo v. d. Haagerleiten25.00011
    Lexa v. d. Haagerleiten25.00011
    Boss v. Labertal25.00011
    Drago v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Tina v. Minatal12.50011
    Centa v. Ohetal12.50011
    Uhl v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Ines v. d. Haagerleiten12.50011
    Sinus Frankundfrei12.50011
    Clara v. d. Wendlinger Seerose12.50011
    Hanko v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Greif v. Zellergarten6.25011
    Charly v. Kraxberg6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Bianka v. d. Wendlinger Seerose6.25011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Birke v. Stammberg6.25011
    Aco v. d. Wendlinger Seerose6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Benno v. Brückhof6.25011
    Bella v. Lamprechtshausner Langhaar6.25011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Riecke Frankundfrei6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Dux v. Imhof6.24022
    Bella v. d. Haagerleiten6.24022
    Corda v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Bella v. d. Aischquelle3.12011
    Bonni v. Lundberg3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Alfons v. d. Kreuthmühle3.12011
    Hella v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Eike3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Dux v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dolf v. Hühnerberg3.12011
    Dixi v. Lamprechtshausen3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s