Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Balto (Charlotte B Lauridsen)
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Balto (Charlotte B Lauridsen)
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Askan v. Iberg and Dam Lillebrusen's Vígdis
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)74
    Ancestor Loss-12
    Ancestor Loss in %119.35 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lillebrusen's Vígdis50.00011
    Casper v.d. Uitvanck50.00011
    Alpha50.00011
    Askan v. Iberg50.00011
    Xenia v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Vidar v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Breston v.d. Voorzorghoeve25.00011
    A' Carla25.00011
    Sandra v. Veldhoeks Dreeven25.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Trazan12.50011
    Amber v. d. Voorzorghoeve12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Marco v. Veldhoeks Dreeven12.50011
    Otti v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Frida12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Hilda v. Notterveld12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.36033
    Bella v. d. Voorzorghoeve6.25011
    Donar v.d. Boevenburg6.25011
    Sita van Veldhoeks Dreeven6.25011
    Erosto6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Lysbjergs B Bob6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Wopke v. Notterveld6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Atempa6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Winston6.25011
    Eggerigh v.h. Diepenveense6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Drejbygaards Inka6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Donna3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Futtrups Cille3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Bølle3.12011
    Sak Fan'E Swadde3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s