Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Janka v. d. Riedleite
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Janka v. d. Riedleite
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Foko v. Erlengrund and Dam Bonie v. Keltenquell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Foko v. Erlengrund50.00011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell50.00011
    Mona v. Linduri25.00011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege25.00011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen25.00011
    Karlo v. Linebrok25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda18.750211
    Lord v. Jurawald12.50011
    Perro Nelha12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Gora v. Linebrok12.50011
    Birka v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Alf v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Laika v. Linduri12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Gitta v. Lossetal9.370211
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Assi Chamavia6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Tuja Chamavia3.12011
    Lord v. Reinufer3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s