Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Preußen's Hesta
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Preußen's Hesta
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide and Dam Osy v. Wiken
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide50.00011
    Osy v. Wiken50.00011
    Aaron v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor25.00011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land18.750211
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Bonny v. Brückhof12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor12.50011
    Elko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Lord v. Hofried12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald9.370211
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide9.370211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Laika v. d. Waterkant9.370211
    Anett v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Dax v. d. Aue6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Corda v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Groll Holsatia6.25011
    Ilka v. Elbufer6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Afra v. Grevensberg6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Bella v. d. Aue3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Edu v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Erle v. Steinroden3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Kessy v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s