Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bille v. Großen Herzberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bille v. Großen Herzberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Conrad v. Birkengehege and Dam Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.516%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Conrad v. Birkengehege50.00011
    Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Laika v. Linduri25.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Pom v. Minatal25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Nora v. Minatal12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Elsa v. Burghöft12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Katja v. Minatal6.25011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.24022
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue6.24022
    Exy v. Minatal6.24022
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Gusti v. Giesenbusch3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Larry v. Ringofen3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s