Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anouk v.d. Weuleskath
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anouk v.d. Weuleskath
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. d. Wallburg and Dam Bille v. Großen Herzberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bille v. Großen Herzberg50.00011
    Hardy v. d. Wallburg50.00011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege25.00011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Vroni v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide15.620211
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Laika v. Linduri12.50011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s