Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Neandertal's Barcadi
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Neandertal's Barcadi
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Blue v. Mühbrooker Meer
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Blue v. Mühbrooker Meer50.00011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50022
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Laura v. Poppenforst9.370211
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Laika v. Linduri6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s