Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anka v. Brägel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anka v. Brägel
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. d. Klosterwiese and Dam Dany v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dany v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese50.00011
    Lukas v. Auwelt25.00011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh18.750211
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Juwel v. Perverberg12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte12.50011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Imme v. Auwelt12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri9.370211
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof9.370211
    Lucie Nelha9.370211
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Esta v. Auwelt6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Brutus v. Stockey3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Asta Westerode3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Asta v. Butendieks3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s