Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Sinus Frankundfrei
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Sinus Frankundfrei
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Benno v. Brückhof and Dam Riecke Frankundfrei
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Benno v. Brückhof50.00011
    Riecke Frankundfrei50.00011
    Corda v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Esko v. Huntetal25.00011
    Becas v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Solojäger's Eike25.00011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek12.50011
    Alka v. Erlesberg12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Cita v. Winterberg12.50011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Bill v. Bessingslust9.370211
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe9.370211
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Yra v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Dux v. Silbersee6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Flott Frankundfrei6.25011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Edda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Ute v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Citta v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Anja v. Taubertal3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Cessy v. Hofried3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Achill v. Jagello3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Cora v. Lindenbauer3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s