Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hanter v. Luerwald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hanter v. Luerwald
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lord v. Linebrok and Dam Dayla v. Luerwald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.025%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lord v. Linebrok50.00011
    Dayla v. Luerwald50.00011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Solojäger's Orkan25.00011
    Cosima v. Luerwald25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda15.620211
    Zappe v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal12.50011
    Cora v. Linebrok12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Artus v. Elztal12.50011
    Solojäger's Lisl12.50011
    Quecke v. Haberland6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf6.25011
    Xorro De Wynen6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Uska v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Mona v. Haberland3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s