Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anna v. Kirchhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anna v. Kirchhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aikfried v. Murner See and Dam Bonny v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.734%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bonny v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Aikfried v. Murner See50.00011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau25.00011
    Grandl De Wynen25.00011
    Hasko v. Linebrok25.00011
    Xanthippe De Wynen12.50011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese12.50011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte12.50011
    Juwel v. Perverberg12.50011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Mando De Wynen6.25011
    Iska v. Werneck6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Orion De Wynen6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Pascal De Wynen6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Karwald6.25011
    Joe De Wynen3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Colt v. Loisachtal3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Cora v. Werneck3.12011
    Asta v. Butendieks3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Caro v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Lessy v. Werlacke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s