Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Brutus v. Heistershecken
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Brutus v. Heistershecken
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hanno v. Emsdeich and Dam Vina v. d. Hafkesdell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)72
    Ancestor Loss-10
    Ancestor Loss in %116.13 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vina v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich50.00011
    Anka v. d. Berkelaue50.00011
    Freddy v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell37.500211
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde37.500211
    Greif v. Reitbach37.500211
    Isabell v. Buchheim25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Debby v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Westfalen's Artus18.750211
    Arras v. Eschbach18.750211
    Rika v. Linduri18.750211
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell18.750211
    Farah v. Hilkefeld12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell9.370211
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide9.370211
    Amsel v. Silbergrund9.370211
    Gina v. Roonstein9.370211
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Dolly Nelha6.25011
    Nimrods Enno6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Baron v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s