Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Adesso v. Gewitter
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Adesso v. Gewitter
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Timmi v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Gewitter v. Eulenspiegel
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gewitter v. Eulenspiegel50.00011
    Timmi v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Fritz v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Ella V. Eulenspiegel25.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Solojäger's Unkas12.50011
    Cäthe v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Dora v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Dag v. Betzloh12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Solojäger's Maraun6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Nöck v. Wiken6.25011
    Aspe v. Betzloh6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Jola Nelha3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s