Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Edda V. Eulenspiegel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Edda V. Eulenspiegel
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Solojäger's Unkas and Dam Cäthe v. Eulenspiegel
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Solojäger's Unkas50.00011
    Cäthe v. Eulenspiegel50.00011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Solojäger's Maraun25.00011
    Nöck v. Wiken25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Jola Nelha12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Lord v. Hofried6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Nimrod's Birko6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Ilka v. Elbufer3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Afra v. Grevensberg3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Vella v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Eiko v. Weithof3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s