Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Günter v. Eulenspiegel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Günter v. Eulenspiegel
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Fritz v. Deutschen Orden and Dam Ella V. Eulenspiegel
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Fritz v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Ella V. Eulenspiegel50.00011
    Dora v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Dag v. Betzloh25.00011
    Solojäger's Unkas25.00011
    Cäthe v. Eulenspiegel25.00011
    Nöck v. Wiken12.50011
    Aspe v. Betzloh12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Pascha v. Elbufer12.50011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden12.50011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Solojäger's Maraun12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.24022
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lord v. Hofried3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s