Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Nia v. Wuddelhoff
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Nia v. Wuddelhoff
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Falko v.d. Segeberger Heide and Dam Meggi v. Wuddelhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Meggi v. Wuddelhof50.00011
    Falko v.d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen25.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof25.00011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff15.620211
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch12.50011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.490312
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff9.370211
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Nostra De Wynen6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Dixi v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Erlo De Wynen3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s