Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Freddy v. Hollbäck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Freddy v. Hollbäck
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Max v. Wuddelhof and Dam Cilly v. Hollbäck
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Max v. Wuddelhof50.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Aska v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof25.00011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch12.50011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer12.50011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer9.370211
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek9.370211
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Nostra De Wynen6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Dixi v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Erlo De Wynen3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s