Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hanni v. Forstkamp
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hanni v. Forstkamp
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Habbo v. Frochtmannshof and Dam Biene v. Forstkamp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Biene v. Forstkamp50.00011
    Habbo v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Quino Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Assi v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer12.50011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen12.50011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Ondra Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.490312
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff9.370211
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.24022
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.24022
    Elko v. Huntetal6.24022
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s