Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hunter v. d. Röthaller
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hunter v. d. Röthaller
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Castor v. Bakumer Esch and Dam Cina v. d. Röthaller
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.660%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cina v. d. Röthaller50.00011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch50.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Mira v. Linduri25.00011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe25.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Cent v. Hasselbach12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Bessi v. Winterberg12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Ass v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Ute v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Beste v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Edda v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s