Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Zyrus ll v. Lönsstein
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Zyrus ll v. Lönsstein
    COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Charly v. Waldvierteler Forst and Dam Vera ll v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vera ll v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Charly v. Waldvierteler Forst50.00011
    Otti v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Basko v. Tannengarten25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Amira v. Waldvierteler Forst25.00011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Victor v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Queen v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Jule v. Linduri12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.490312
    Gera v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Herman v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Don v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s