Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Echo v. Luerwald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Echo v. Luerwald
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gauner v. Stockey and Dam Cosima v. Luerwald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gauner v. Stockey50.00011
    Cosima v. Luerwald50.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Alex v. Bannwald25.00011
    Evita v. Stockey25.00011
    Zappe v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Asco Westerode12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Xorro De Wynen12.50011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf12.50011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof12.50022
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel9.370211
    Becas v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Amber De Wynen6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Uska v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.25011
    Orion De Wynen6.25011
    Pascal De Wynen6.25011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Cent v. Hofried6.24022
    Alf v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Priska De Wynen3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Colt v. Loisachtal3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Muska v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s