Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ilko v. Hasenkamp
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ilko v. Hasenkamp
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Illo v. d. Trave and Dam Lea v. Auwelt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Illo v. d. Trave50.00011
    Lea v. Auwelt50.00011
    Happy v. d. Trave25.00011
    Imme v. Auwelt25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Cessy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Esta v. Auwelt12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel9.370211
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Brutus v. Stockey6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Asta Westerode6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Hektor v. Geierling3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s