Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Festus v. Lehmhaus
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Festus v. Lehmhaus
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Drago v. Rodekopp and Dam Isolde v. Hasenkamp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Drago v. Rodekopp50.00011
    Isolde v. Hasenkamp50.00011
    Illo v. d. Trave25.00011
    Aika v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Lea v. Auwelt25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda15.620211
    Imme v. Auwelt12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Tanja De Wynen12.50011
    Happy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Vulkan De Wynen6.25011
    Esta v. Auwelt6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cessy v. d. Trave6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Jolly De Wynen6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Brutus v. Stockey3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Asta Westerode3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s