Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Basco v. d. Klosterwiese
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Basco v. d. Klosterwiese
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. Paradies and Dam Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hardy v. Paradies50.00011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide50.00011
    Isko v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Dele v. Paradies25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Annett v. Paradies12.50011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Elko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Dax v. d. Aue6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Erle v. Steinroden3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Anka3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Bella v. d. Aue3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Edu v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s