Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bea a.d. Holzland
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bea a.d. Holzland
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide and Dam Fara v. Bussenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Fara v. Bussenhof50.00011
    Hedda v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Pom v. Minatal25.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Elsa v. Burghöft12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Anka v. Schönrain12.50011
    Nora v. Minatal12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Katja v. Minatal6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue6.24022
    Exy v. Minatal6.24022
    Cliff v. Linduri6.24022
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gusti v. Giesenbusch3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Larry v. Ringofen3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s