Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Katta v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Katta v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide and Dam Nixe v. Wasserplatz
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide50.00011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch25.00011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp15.620211
    Mira v. Linduri12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Graf Nelha12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s