Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aron v. Rösslerhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aron v. Rösslerhof
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide and Dam Olga Nelha
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Olga Nelha50.00011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald25.00011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Wenzel De Wynen25.00011
    Nimrod's Birko18.750211
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden12.50011
    Farah v. Minatal12.50011
    Jolly De Wynen12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Elsa v. Burghöft12.50011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau12.50011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Otti v. Faistenau6.25011
    Berry v. Nordpark6.25011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Esso v. Oberleis6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Dona v. Jägerhalle6.25011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Exy v. Minatal6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Cara Frankundfrei3.12011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Betty v.d. Steubach3.12011
    Cord v. d. Sechsämter Stadt3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Gin v. Reuth3.12011
    Aris Soprec3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Jenny De Wynen3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Dralle v. Waldesgryn3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Asta v. Amesleiten3.12011
    Bodo v.d. Wilhelmsburg3.12011
    Achill v. Jagello3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Rita v.Kettenlüss3.12011
    Dixie v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Larry v. Ringofen3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s