Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Brando v. Hauersteig
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Brando v. Hauersteig
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Axl v. Poppenforst and Dam Eika v. Niederösterreich
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)82
    Ancestor Loss-20
    Ancestor Loss in %132.26 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jacko50.00011
    Sussi50.00011
    Eika v. Niederösterreich50.00011
    Axl v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Ajax v. Störenhaus25.00011
    Atica25.00011
    Bessie25.00011
    Daiko v. Leibnitzer Feld25.00011
    Chaco25.00011
    Centa v. Niederösterreich25.00011
    Hanko v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Wanda v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Benno v. d. Sorge18.75033
    Laura v. Poppenforst18.750211
    Aron v. Rösslerhof12.50011
    Stella12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Bit12.50011
    Vallensbæks Vigan12.50011
    Olle v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Jutta Nelha12.50011
    King v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Paw12.50011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Dux v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Brith12.50011
    Bettina v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Andri12.50011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst9.370211
    Natja v. d. Holzheide9.370211
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Jerome De Wynen9.370211
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Iltis v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Adda v. Wetternwege6.25011
    Freltofts Assi6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Vallensbæks Minka6.25011
    Olga Nelha6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Amsel v. d. Leda6.25011
    Vallensbæks Tikki6.25011
    Cent6.25011
    Bella v. Peigarten6.25011
    Benn v. Moorkamp6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Catja v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Vallensbæks Ricki6.25011
    Drossel v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Basko v. Neuenhof6.25011
    Anja6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Arco v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Esta v. Leefeld3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Wenzel De Wynen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s