Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Nemo v. Schatzrain
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Nemo v. Schatzrain
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dag v. Betzloh and Dam Maja v. Schatzrain
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Maja v. Schatzrain50.00011
    Dag v. Betzloh50.00011
    Pascha v. Elbufer25.00011
    Helge v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Aspe v. Betzloh25.00011
    Anton v. Keltenquell25.00011
    Artus v. Elztal12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Maja v. Elbufer12.50011
    Solojäger's Monarch12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Dina v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege12.50011
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Alka v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Laika v. Linduri6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Flott Frankundfrei3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s