Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Quandola v. Schatzrain
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Quandola v. Schatzrain
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Jockel v. Schlemminer Forst and Dam Okka v. Schatzrain
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jockel v. Schlemminer Forst50.00011
    Okka v. Schatzrain50.00011
    Alex v. Murner See25.00011
    Mona v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Chef v. Seulingswald25.00011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Anton v. Keltenquell12.50011
    Helge v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Elkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Ibse v. Linebrok12.50011
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Hella v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Solojäger's Monarch6.25011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.24022
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf3.12011
    Xorro De Wynen3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Jola Nelha3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s