Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dark v. d. Vorheide
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dark v. d. Vorheide
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Illo v. d. Trave and Dam Walburga v. Fasanenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Illo v. d. Trave50.00011
    Walburga v. Fasanenhof50.00011
    Happy v. d. Trave25.00011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide25.00011
    Tessa v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz18.750211
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte12.50011
    Cessy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Birko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Laura v. Poppenforst9.370211
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Asta v. Butendieks3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s