Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Lara v. Linebrok
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Lara v. Linebrok
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hanno v. Lönsstein and Dam Hella v. Nörderkamp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 4.688%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hella v. Nörderkamp50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Gera v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Groll v. Huntetal25.00011
    Cora v. Linebrok25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620211
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50022
    Bruna v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Quecke v. Haberland12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof9.36033
    Mona v. Haberland6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cita v. Winterberg6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Enno v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Dolli v. d. Jagdhütte3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Kimo v. Haberland3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s