Pedigree Analysis

Generations

Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Arco v. d. Berkelaue

This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

COI Calculation - Arco v. d. Berkelaue

COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!

COI Calculation - Sire Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Isabell v. Buchheim

Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)

This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

# of dogs
Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
Ancestor Loss0
Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

Contributing Ancestors

AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
Isabell v. Buchheim50.00011
Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
Suko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
Leonie v. Alten Hafen25.00011
Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
Anja v. Veybach12.50011
Gera v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
Westfalen's Artus12.50011
Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
Rika v. Linduri12.50011
Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
Jule v. Linduri6.25011
Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
Milla v. Lönsstein6.25011
Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
Lucie Nelha3.12011
Farah v. Minatal3.12011
Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
Jerome De Wynen3.12011
Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
Dina Chamavia3.12011
Last updated Tuesday 19 March 2019 08:59 CET


I have 🍪s