Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Joschka v. Geierling
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Joschka v. Geierling
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hektor v. Geierling and Dam Arlett v. d. Wandelburg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arlett v. d. Wandelburg50.00011
    Hektor v. Geierling50.00011
    Ester v. Geierling25.00011
    Irrwisch De Wynen25.00011
    Centa v. Mönchsbrunnen25.00011
    Dirk v. Geierling25.00011
    Farah v. Lossetal12.50011
    Biene v. Geierling12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Troll v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle12.50011
    Utz v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bautz v. Grabengrund12.50011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller6.25011
    Alf v. Geierling6.25011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Aspe v. Geierling6.25011
    Mira v. Feuersang6.25011
    Mary v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gilla v. Reinufer6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Timm v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.24022
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Dax v. Horsetal3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Astra v. Klosterberg3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Milla v. Feuersang3.12011
    Astor v. Hofried3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Arko v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. d. Strohee3.12011
    Asta v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Lux v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Dunja v. Wasserschlob3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Citta v. Felsenkeller3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s