Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gnipahålans Felicia Flox
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gnipahålans Felicia Flox
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Joschka v. Geierling and Dam Mariad Säteri Freja
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.855%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Joschka v. Geierling50.00011
    Mariad Säteri Freja50.00011
    Hektor v. Geierling25.00011
    Arro25.00011
    Knutbäckens Yoko25.00011
    Arlett v. d. Wandelburg25.00011
    Alf v. Geierling15.620211
    Irrwisch De Wynen12.50011
    Dirk v. Geierling12.50011
    Falla12.50011
    Knutbäckens Virtuos12.50011
    Ester v. Geierling12.50011
    Centa v. Mönchsbrunnen12.50011
    Giesa v. Arlsberg12.50011
    Nero v. Wolfsgrund9.370211
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.25011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Basta6.25011
    Holm Frankundfrei6.25011
    Bautz v. Grabengrund6.25011
    Nostra v. d. Frankenburg6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Erle v. Fichtenkopf6.25011
    Farah v. Lossetal6.25011
    Biene v. Geierling6.25011
    Iska v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Mentor Fortuna3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Cilli v. Grünen Wege3.12011
    Aspe v. Geierling3.12011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Falk v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Anuschka v. Basbeck3.12011
    Dingo v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller3.12011
    Boris v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Mira v. Feuersang3.12011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Hesta v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Flora v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Timm v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Dianna v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nadja v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cox v. Lindenbauer3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s