Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Yndra v. Lönsstein
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Yndra v. Lönsstein
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. Heek and Dam Vera ll v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hardy v. Heek50.00011
    Vera ll v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Otti v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Basko v. Tannengarten25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck25.00011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Jule v. Linduri12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.24022
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s