Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elsa v. Kemmberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elsa v. Kemmberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Foks v. Langer-Rau and Dam Gesche v. Burghöft
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.684%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gesche v. Burghöft50.00011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau50.00011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau25.00011
    Mirco v. Linduri25.00011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Ojah v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Elsa v. Burghöft12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Cora v. Karwald12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Caro v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Lessy v. Werlacke6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Larry v. Ringofen3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s