Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Centa v. Ohetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Centa v. Ohetal
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Greif v. Zellergarten and Dam Birke v. Stammberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Greif v. Zellergarten50.00011
    Birke v. Stammberg50.00011
    Bella v. d. Aischquelle25.00011
    Alfons v. d. Kreuthmühle25.00011
    Bonni v. Lundberg25.00011
    Mando De Wynen25.00011
    Joe De Wynen12.50011
    Jula Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Gilla De Wynen12.50011
    Afra v. Erlengrund12.50011
    Solojäger's Elch12.50011
    Askia v. Buchheim12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff9.370211
    Cent v. Hofried9.370211
    Hasso v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Hazel De Wynen6.25011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Erle v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff6.25011
    Boro v. Silbersee6.25011
    Birko v. Lossetal6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Zahra v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Bob v. Zent-hof3.12011
    Yra v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Dux v. Silbersee3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s