Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Junia v. Veybach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Junia v. Veybach
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Max v. d. Riedleite and Dam Izzy v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Max v. d. Riedleite50.00011
    Izzy v. Buchheim50.00011
    Farah v. Kappelbuck25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Anja v. Veybach12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald12.50011
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Quelle v. Buchheim12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Milla v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Aiko v. Aischtal6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Conny v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Britta v. Distelberg3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s