Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Baggy v.d. Reutereiche
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Baggy v.d. Reutereiche
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hektor v. Emsdeich and Dam Andra v.d. Reutereiche
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hektor v. Emsdeich50.00011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche50.00011
    Samson v. Linduri25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Debby v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Ira v. Stockey25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Gusti v. Stockey12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld12.50011
    Herman v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Dolly Nelha6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Nimrods Enno6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Baron v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s