Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Etzel v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Etzel v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Greif v. Reitbach and Dam Katteneck's Daisy
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Greif v. Reitbach50.00011
    Katteneck's Daisy50.00011
    Cora v. Heek50.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies50.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda31.250321
    Anka v. Heek25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri25.00011
    Isko v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Brack v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Dele v. Paradies25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri25.00011
    Aenne v. Stockey25.00011
    Gitta v. Lossetal15.620321
    Graf v. Silbersee15.620321
    Annett v. Paradies12.50011
    Clitt v. Westermoor DK12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Laika v. Kampstüh12.50011
    Evita v. Stockey12.50011
    Igor v. Linebrok12.50011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Orpheus v. Innviertel DK12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Jaspa v. Innviertel DK6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Farah v. Innviertel DK6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Grando v. d. Schladebacher Alm6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Beste v. Hegholz6.25011
    Yenni v. Westermoor6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Asco Westerode6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alba v. Immenhof3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s