Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bonie v. Keltenquell
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bonie v. Keltenquell
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Karlo v. Linebrok and Dam Bonie v. Birkengehege
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.051%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bonie v. Birkengehege50.00011
    Karlo v. Linebrok50.00011
    Gora v. Linebrok25.00011
    Laika v. Linduri25.00011
    Lord v. Jurawald25.00011
    Perro Nelha25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung12.50011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Solojäger's Granne12.50011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.490312
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Cora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cessy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Quecke v. Haberland3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Artemis v. d. Wandelburg3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s