Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Kendo v. Alten Hafen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Kendo v. Alten Hafen
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Osca Aus Grupilinga and Dam Auguste v. Eulenspiegel
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Auguste v. Eulenspiegel50.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Solojäger's Laura25.00011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Gitta v. Buchheim12.50011
    Lord v. Jurawald12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.24022
    Eiko v. Weithof3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Vella v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s