Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Detje v. Adewacht
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Detje v. Adewacht
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arko v. Deutschen Orden and Dam Este v. Linebrok
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Este v. Linebrok50.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Gitta v. Buchheim25.00011
    Lord v. Jurawald25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee15.620211
    Gwenda v. Jurawald12.50011
    Dax Nelha12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal12.50011
    Distel v. Buchheim12.50011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50022
    Cora v. Linebrok12.50011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund6.25011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Birke Nelha6.25011
    Quacks v. Lossetal6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Antje v. Buchheim6.25011
    Quecke v. Haberland6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.24022
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Nixe v. Lossetal3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Cessy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Mona v. Haberland3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Artemis v. d. Wandelburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s